Analysis of Twitter Sentiment Towards Madrasahs Using Classification Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1088Keywords:
Data Mining, Sentiment Analysis, ClassificationAbstract
In today's digital era, the influence and use of the internet has become a necessity, especially in Indonesia itself, internet users in early 2021 reached 202.6 million people. The most widely used internet use by Indonesians is social media. Several incidents of sexual violence that occurred in the madrasa environment as reported in the media, the emergence of radical Islamic issues which he said were the fruit of thoughts from the madrasa environment, terrorism which was also said to come from misinterpreting knowledge from madrasahs, intolerance to different religions, changes in the character of madrasah students and so on will cause negative thoughts towards madrasah. To find out how the sentiment of social media users towards madrasahs, a study was conducted on analisis twitter sentiment towards madrasah using the classification method. The methods used are Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT) and K – Nearest Neighbor (K-NN). Toimprove the performance of the classification method is carried out using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) selection feature. On the other hand, tools gataframework, execute Python script dan rapidminer diguna kan jug a dalam penelitian this to membantu preprocessi ng dan cleansing pa da datasethingga membantu menciptaka n corpus dan sentiment ana lysis. Acuration obtained from the Naïve Bayes algorithm accuracy: 76.86% +/- 5.24% (micro average: 76.86%), Decision Tree accuracy: 61.38% +/- 5.46% (micro average: 61.35%), K-NN accuracy: 74.70% +/- 4.83% (micro average: 74.67%), Naïve Bayes PSO accuracy: 80.80% +/- 4.86% (micro average: 80.79%, Decision Tree PSO accuracy: 65.27% +/- 5.26% (micro average: 65.28%), and K-NN PSO accuracy: 67.24% +/- 7.92% (micro average: 67.25%). The results showed that the Naïve Bayes PSO algorithm got the best and accurate results. This study succeeded in obtaining an effective and best algorithm in classifying positive comments and negative comments related to sentiment analysis towards madrasahs by classification method.
Downloads
References
Aditia Rakhmat Sentiaji, A. M. B., Sarjana, P. S., Statistika, D., Matematika, F., Ilmu, D. A. N., & Alam, P. (2014). Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Acara Televisi Berdasarkan Opini Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Dan Informatika (KOMPUTA).
Alita, D., Priyanta, S., & Rokhman, N. (2019). Analysis of Emoticon and Sarcasm Effect on Sentiment Analysis of Indonesian Language on Twitter. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 5(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.5.2.100-109
Alkhalifi, Y., Gata, W., Prasetyo, A., & Budiawan, I. (2020). Analisis Sentimen Penghapusan Ujian Nasional pada Twitter Menggunakan Support Vector Machine dan Naïve Bayes berbasis Particle Swarm Optimization. CoreIT, 6(2), 71–78. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/coreit/article/view/9723
Badri, M. (2011). Corporate Marketing and Communication. Universitas Mercu Buana.
Brahimi, B., Touahria, M., & Tari, A. (2019). Improving sentiment analysis in Arabic: A combined approach. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 33(10), 1242–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.07.011
Brogan, C. (2011). Social Media 101: Tactics and Tips to Develop Your Business Online.
Buntoro, G. A. (2017). Analisis Sentimen Calon Gubernur DKI Jakarta 2017 Di Twitter. Integer Journal, 2(1), 32–41. https://t.co/jrvaMsgBdH
Dailey, P. R. (2009). Social Media: Finding Its Way into Your Business Strategy and Culture. Linkage.
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2013). Deep learning: Methods and applications. Foundations and Trends in Signal Processing, 7(3–4), 197–387. https://doi.org/10.1561/2000000039
Evanko, D. (2010). Optical imaging of the native brain. Nature Methods, 7(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.284
Faisal, A., Alkhalifi, Y., Rifai, A., & Gata, W. (2020). Analisis Sentimen Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dengan Algoritma Klasifikasi Berbasis Particle Swarm Optimization. JOINTECS (Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science), 5(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.31328/jointecs.v5i2.1362
Fauzi, A., Rais, A. N., Akbar, M. F., & Gata, W. (2018). Analisis Sentimen Berinternet Pada Media Sosial AMIK BSI Tegal Dengan Menggunakan Algoritma Naive Bayes. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, 46–54.
G.Wahyuningtyas, I. M. and S. (2014). Aplikasi Data Mining untuk Penilaian Kredit Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Decision Tree. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni Pomits, 1(1), 1–6.
Gata, W. (2017). Akurasi Text Mining Menggunakan Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbour pada Data Content Berita SMS. 6, 1–13.
Giovani, A. P., Ardiansyah, A., Haryanti, T., Kurniawati, L., & Gata, W. (2020). Analisis Sentimen Aplikasi Ruang Guru Di Twitter Menggunakan Algoritma Klasifikasi. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 14(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v14i2.679
He, W., Wu, H., Yan, G., Akula, V., & Shen, J. (2015). A novel social media competitive analytics framework with sentiment benchmarks. Information and Management, 52(7), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.04.006
Ibrahim, D. (2017). Analisis Hubungan antar Faktor dan Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi pada Penentuan Penundaan Penerbangan. 2017, September, 15– 17.
Kasih, P. (2019). Pemodelan Data Mining Decision Tree Dengan Classification Error Untuk Seleksi Calon Anggota Tim Paduan Suara. Innovation in Research of Informatics (INNOVATICS), 2, 63–69.
Keilany, Z. (1978). Book Reviews: Book Reviews. Review of Social Economy, 36(2), 228–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767800000037
Muktamar, B. A., Setiawan, N. A., & Adji, T. B. (2015). Pembobotan Korelasi Pada Naïve Bayes Classifier. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Multimedia 2015, 2, 43–47.
Nurjanah, W. E., Perdana, R. S., & Fauzi, M. A. (2017). Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Tayangan Televisi Berdasarkan Opini Masyarakat pada Media Sosial Twitter menggunakan Metode K-Nearest Neighbor dan Pembobotan Jumlah Retweet. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer (J-PTIIK) Universitas Brawijaya, 1(12), 1750–1757.
Peter Norvig, R. (2010). Artificial intelligence—a modern approach by Stuart. Cambridge University Press.
Pratomo, Y. (2021). Sejarah Twitter, Jejaring Sosial yang Terinspirasi dari SMS. Tekno.Kompas.Com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/04/14/20420077/sejarah-twitter-jejaring-sosial-yang-terinspirasi-dari-sms?page=all
Purnama, H. (2011). Media Sosial Di Era Pemasaran 3.0. Corporate and Marketing Communication. Jakarta?: Pusat Studi Komunikasi Dan Bisnis Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Mercu Buana, Pp 107-124.
Ratino, Hafidz, N., Anggraeni, S., & Gata, W. (2020). Sentimen Analisis Informasi Covid-19 menggunakan Support Vector Machine dan Naïve Bayes. Jurnal JUPITER, 12(2), 1–11.
Riyanto, G. P. (2021). Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia 2021 Tembus 202 Juta. Tekno.Kompas.Com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2021/02/23/16100057/jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-2021-tembus-202-juta
Rozi, I., Pramono, S., & Dahlan, E. (2012). Implementasi Opinion Mining (Analisis Sentimen) Untuk Ekstraksi Data Opini Publik Pada Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal EECCIS, 6(1), 37–43.
S.A Pattekari, A. P. (2012). Prediction system for heart disease using Na ??ve Bayes. International Journal of Advanced Com-Puter and Mathematical Sciences, 3(3), 290–294.
Safitri, S. I., Suhery, C., & Bahri, S. (2021). Implementasi Algoritma K–Means Untuk Clustering Sentimen Pada Opini Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Penerbangan. Coding Jurnal Komputer Dan Aplikasi, 09(02), 186–197. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jcskommipa/article/view/47377
Samsir, Ambiyar, Unung Verawardina, Firman Edi, R. W. (2021). Analisis Sentimen Pembelajaran Daring Pada Twitter di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Menggunakan Metode Naïve Bayes. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 5(1), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i1.2604
Setiawan, H., Utami, E., & Sudarmawan, S. (2021). Analisis Sentimen Twitter Kuliah Online Pasca Covid-19 Menggunakan Algoritma Support Vector Machine dan Naive Bayes. Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi Dan Informatika), 5(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v5i1.5189
Shafique, U., & Qaiser, H. (2014). A Comparative Study of Data Mining Process Models ( KDD , CRISP-DM and SEMMA ). International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 12(1), 217–222. http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/
Suryanto, A., Alfarobi, I., Tutupoly, T. A., & Fauziahti, R. (2019). Optimasi Naive Bayes Menggunakan Optimize Weights Dan Stratified Pada Data Kredit Koperasi. Mantik Penusa, 3(1), 211–219.
Turban, E. (2005). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Andi.
Xiaojun, Z. (2011). Michael W. Berry and Jacob Kogan (eds.): Text mining: applications and theory. Information Retrieval, 14(2), 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-010-9153-5
Y. Sunoto, B. W. (2014). Analisis Testimonial Wisatawan Menggunakan Text Mining Dengan Metode Naive Bayes DanDecision Tree, Studi Kasus Pada Hotel Hotel Di Jakarta. Jurnal Informatika Dan Bisnis ANALISIS, 3(2), 39–49.
Zumarniansyah, A., Pebrianto, R., & ... (2020). Twitter Sentiment Analysis of Post Natural Disasters Using Comparative Classification Algorithm Support Vector Machine and …. Jurnal Pilar Nusa …, 169–174. http://ejournal.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/pilar/article/view/1423
CITEDNESS IN SCOPUS
CITEDNESS IN WOS
