Towards Improving 5G Quality of Experience: Fuzzy as a Mathematical Model to Migrate Virtual Machine Server in The Defined Time Frame

Authors

  • Taufik Hidayat Universitas Indonesia
  • Kalamullah Ramli Universitas Indonesia
  • R. Deiny Mardian Universitas Indonesia
  • Rahutomo Mahardiko PT. BFI Finance Indonesia, Tbk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1646

Keywords:

Virtual Machine Server, Resource Balancing, Fuzzy Model, 5G Quality

Abstract

The industry and government have recently acknowledged and used virtual machines (VM) to promote their businesses. During the process of VM, some problems might occur. The issues, such as a heavy load of memory, a large load of CPU, a massive load of a disk, a high load of network and time-defined migration, might interrupt the business processes. This paper identifies the migration process among hosts for VM to overcome the problem within the defined time frame of migration. The introduction of VMs migration in a timely manner is to detect a problem earlier. There are workload parameters, such as network, CPU, disk and memory as our parameters. To overcome the issue, we have to follow the Model named Fuzzy rule. The rule follows the basic of tree model for decision-making. The application of the fuzzy Model for the study is to determine VMs allocation from busy VMs to vacant VMs for balancing purposes. The result of the study showed that the use of the fuzzy Model to forecast VMs migration based on the defined rule had 2 positive impacts. The positive impacts are (1) Time frame live migration of VMs can reduce workload by 80 %. This aims to reduce failures in performing a live migration of VMs to increase data center performance. (2) In testing, the fuzzy Model can provide results with an accuracy of 90 %, so this model can perform a live migration of VMs precisely in determining the execution time. Next, the workload could be balanced among VMs. This research could be used further to improve 5G Quality of Experience (QoE) shortly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kalamullah Ramli, Universitas Indonesia

 

 

R. Deiny Mardian, Universitas Indonesia

 

 

Rahutomo Mahardiko, PT. BFI Finance Indonesia, Tbk

 

 

References

Ahmad, R. W., Gani, A., Shiraz, M., Xia, F., & Madani, S. A. (2015). Virtual machine migration in cloud data centers: a review, taxonomy, and open research issues. The Journal of Supercomputing, 71(7), 2473-2515.

Alharbe, N., Aljohani, A., & Rakrouki, M. A. (2022). A Fuzzy Grouping Genetic Algorithm for Solving a Real-World Virtual Machine Placement Problem in a Healthcare-Cloud. Algorithms, 15(4), 128.

Badem, H., Basturk, A., Caliskan, A., & Yuksel, M. E. (2017). A new efficient training strategy for deep neural networks by hybridization of artificial bee colony and limited–memory BFGS optimization algorithms. Neurocomputing, 266, 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.061

Bhardwaj, A., & Rama Krishna, C. (2019). A Container-Based Technique to Improve Virtual Machine Migration in Cloud Computing. IETE Journal of Research, 68(1), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2019.1605848

Elsaid, M. E., Abbas, H. M., & Meinel, C. (2021). Virtual machines pre-copy live migration cost modeling and prediction: a survey. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 1-34.

Farzai, S., Shirvani, M. H., & Rabbani, M. (2020). Multi-objective communication-aware optimization for virtual machine placement in cloud datacenters. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 28, 100374.

Gilesh, M. P., Jain, S., Madhu Kumar, S., Jacob, L., & Bellur, U. (2020). Opportunistic live migration of virtual machines. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(5), e5477.

Gümü?çü, A., Tenekeci, M. E., & Bilgili, A. V. (2020). Estimation of wheat planting date using machine learning algorithms based on available climate data. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2019.01.010

Guo, J., Li, Y., Liu, C., Zhao, Z., & Zhang, B. (2022, 13-16 Feb. 2022). Research on a Virtual Machine Mode Transfer Method Supporting Energy Consumption Optimization. 2022 24th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT),

Guo, L., Lu, C., & Wu, G. (2023). Approximation algorithms for a virtual machine allocation problem with finite types. Information Processing Letters, 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2022.106339

Haris, R. M., Khan, K. M., & Nhlabatsi, A. (2022a). Live migration of virtual machine memory content in networked systems. Computer Networks, 209, 108898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.108898

Haris, R. M., Khan, K. M., & Nhlabatsi, A. (2022b). Live migration of virtual machine memory content in networked systems. Computer Networks, 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.108898

Hidayat, T., & Alaydrus, M. (2019, 16-17 Oct. 2019). Performance Analysis and Mitigation of Virtual Machine Server by using Naive Bayes Classification. 2019 Fourth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC),

Hossain, M. K., Rahman, M., Hossain, A., Rahman, S. Y., & Islam, M. M. (2020, 21-22 Dec. 2020). Active & Idle Virtual Machine Migration Algorithm- a new Ant Colony Optimization approach to consolidate Virtual Machines and ensure Green Cloud Computing. 2020 Emerging Technology in Computing, Communication and Electronics (ETCCE),

Hu, B., Lei, Z., Lei, Y., Xu, D., & Li, J. (2011). A time-series based precopy approach for live migration of virtual machines. 2011 IEEE 17th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems,

Hu, L., Zhao, J., Xu, G., Ding, Y., & Chu, J. (2013). HMDC: Live virtual machine migration based on hybrid memory copy and delta compression. Appl. Math, 7(2L), 639-646.

Jamali, S., Malektaji, S., & Analoui, M. (2016). An imperialist competitive algorithm for virtual machine placement in cloud computing. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 29(3), 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2016.1212101

Jin, H., Deng, L., Wu, S., Shi, X., & Pan, X. (2009). Live virtual machine migration with adaptive, memory compression. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops,

Jin, H., Gao, W., Wu, S., Shi, X., Wu, X., & Zhou, F. (2011). Optimizing the live migration of virtual machine by CPU scheduling. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(4), 1088-1096.

Karmakar, K., Banerjee, S., Das, R. K., & Khatua, S. (2022). Utilization aware and network I/O intensive virtual machine placement policies for cloud data center. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103442

Katal, A., Bajoria, V., & Sethi, V. (2021). Simulated annealing based approach for virtual machine live migration. 2021 8th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communications (ICSCC),

Kaur, R., Chana, I., & Bhattacharya, J. (2018). Data deduplication techniques for efficient cloud storage management: a systematic review. The Journal of Supercomputing, 74(5), 2035-2085.

Kokkinos, P., Kalogeras, D., Levin, A., & Varvarigos, E. (2016). Survey: Live Migration and Disaster Recovery over Long-Distance Networks. ACM Computing Surveys, 49(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940295

Kumar, K., Patange, K., Pete, P., Wankhade, M., Chatterjee, A., & Kurhekar, M. (2022). Power and Energy-efficient VM scheduling in OpenStack Cloud Through Migration and Consolidation using Wake-on-LAN. IETE Journal of Research, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2022.2060872

Kumar, Y., Kaul, S., & Hu, Y.-C. (2022). Machine learning for energy-resource allocation, workflow scheduling and live migration in cloud computing: State-of-the-art survey. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2022.100780

Le, T. (2020). A survey of live Virtual Machine migration techniques. Computer Science Review, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100304

Li, X., Garraghan, P., Jiang, X., Wu, Z., & Xu, J. (2017). Holistic virtual machine scheduling in cloud datacenters towards minimizing total energy. IEEE Transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 29(6), 1317-1331.

Moura, B. M. P., Schneider, G. B., Yamin, A. C., Santos, H., Reiser, R. H. S., & Bedregal, B. (2022). Interval-valued Fuzzy Logic approach for overloaded hosts in consolidation of virtual machines in cloud computing. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 446, 144-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2021.03.001

Mugisha, E., & Zhang, G. (2017). Reliable multi-cloud storage architecture based on erasure code to improve storage performance and failure recovery. International Journal of Advanced Cloud Computing and Applied Research, 3(1), 26-40.

Rajakumari, K., Kumar, M. V., Verma, G., Balu, S., Sharma, D. K., & Sengan, S. (2022). Fuzzy Based Ant Colony Optimization Scheduling in Cloud Computing. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng., 40(2), 581-592.

Ramanathan, S., Kondepu, K., Razo, M., Tacca, M., Valcarenghi, L., & Fumagalli, A. (2021). Live migration of virtual machine and container based mobile core network components: A comprehensive study. IEEE Access, 9, 105082-105100.

Rukmini, S., & Shridevi, S. (2023). An optimal solution to reduce virtual machine migration SLA using host power. Measurement: Sensors, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100628

Satpathy, A., Sahoo, M. N., Mishra, A., Majhi, B., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Bakshi, S. (2021). A Service Sustainable Live Migration Strategy for Multiple Virtual Machines in Cloud Data Centers. Big Data Research, 25, 100213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2021.100213

Seddiki, D., Galán, S. G., Expósito, J. E. M., Ibañez, M. V., Marciniak, T., & Pérez de Prado, R. J. (2022). Sustainable expert virtual machine migration in dynamic clouds. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108257

Shao, Y., Yang, Q., Gu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2020). A Dynamic Virtual Machine Resource Consolidation Strategy Based on a Gray Model and Improved Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Access, 8, 228639-228654. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046318

Silva Filho, M. C., Monteiro, C. C., Inácio, P. R. M., & Freire, M. M. (2018). Approaches for optimizing virtual machine placement and migration in cloud environments: A survey. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 111, 222-250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.08.010

Singh, S., & Singh, D. (2020). Live virtual machine migration techniques in cloud computing. In Data Security in Internet of Things Based RFID and WSN Systems Applications (pp. 99-106). CRC Press.

Svard, P., Tordsson, J., Hudzia, B., & Elmroth, E. (2011). High performance live migration through dynamic page transfer reordering and compression. 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science,

Tao, Z., Xia, Q., Hao, Z., Li, C., Ma, L., Yi, S., & Li, Q. (2019). A survey of virtual machine management in edge computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1482-1499.

Wang, Z., Sun, D., Xue, G., Qian, S., Li, G., & Li, M. (2019). Ada-Things: An adaptive virtual machine monitoring and migration strategy for internet of things applications. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 132, 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.06.009

Yin, L., & Zhang, D. (2022). The Calculation Method of the Network Security Probability of the Multi-rail Division Based on Fuzzy Inference. Mobile Networks and Applications, 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-05

How to Cite

Hidayat, T., Ramli, K., Mardian, R. D., & Mahardiko, R. (2023). Towards Improving 5G Quality of Experience: Fuzzy as a Mathematical Model to Migrate Virtual Machine Server in The Defined Time Frame . Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 4(2), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1646