Number of Machine and Material Requirements for Production Planning of Tablet Tooling with the Demand of 200 Units/Day

Authors

  • Nanang Qosim Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Andre Kurniawan Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Moh. Nasir Hariyanto Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Zakki F. Emzain Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Moh. Hartono Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • AM Mufarrih Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v2i2.209

Keywords:

tablet tooling, number of machines, need of materials, die and punch, demand

Abstract

Shaping and marketing a product in tablet form is an easy and economical alternative to product shaping. Products in tablet form now cover almost all fields, so that the demand for tablet tooling of various sizes and variations continues to increase. As an effort to support the effectiveness and proper industrial planning, it is necessary to carry out an analysis of the machine and material requirements to produce tablet tooling which is the aim of this study. To achieve these objectives, the methods used in this study include product design, operation plan analysis, and calculation of material requirements and number of machines. The result shows that the number of machine requirements to manufacture the die and punch of tablet tooling with the demand of 200 unit/day are two units of power hacksaw, five units of lathe machine, and a unit of milling machine. On the other hand, the material requirements needed in one day are 22.24 m (Ø45 mm x 5 bars) and 12.79 m (Ø18 mm x 3 bars).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adulyasak, Y., Cordeau, J.-F., & Jans, R. (2015). The production routing problem: A review of formulations and solution algorithms. Computers & Operations Research, 55, 141-152.

Apple, J. M. G., & Mardiono, N. M. T. (1990). Tataletak pabrik dan pemindahan bahan: Penerbit ITB.

Arif, M. (2017). Perancangan Tata Letak Pabrik: Deepublish.

Deviyanti, I. S., Kunhadi, D., & Frastian, J. (2018). Perencanaan Tata Letak Fasilitas Industri Galangan Kapal Di Lamongan. Matrik (Manajemen dan Teknik Industri-Produksi), 15(1), 67-85.

Dewangga, S. P. F., Nugraha, I. N. P., & Dantes, K. R. (2017). Pengaruh Variasi Kecepatan Putaran Mesin Bubut Terhadap Keausan Pada Alat Potong Pahat Hsstipe Bohler Mo 1/2x4. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Undiksha, 5(1).

Drozda, T. J. (1983). Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook: Machining: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

Faishol, M., Hastuti, S., & Ulya, M. (2013). Perancangan ulang tata letak fasilitas produksi pabrik tahu srikandi junok Bangkalan. Agrointek, 7(2), 59-67.

Hidayat, U. (2011). Desain tata letak pabrik: plant lay out: Ikopin Press.

Jutz, H. (2006). Westermann Tables For The Metal Trade: New Age International.

Nurchajat, N. (2017, 2017). Analisis Perencanaan Anggaran Biaya Pembuatankomponen Bak Pick Up Kapasitas 840 Kg.

Phillips, E. J., & Engineers, S. o. M. (1997). Manufacturing Plant Layout: Fundamentals and Fine Points of Optimum Facility Design: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

Qosim, N., & Hartono, M. (2019). Machining time and number of machine for the production planning of wheel nut releaser with the demand of 100 units/day. Int. J. of Adv. in Appl. Sci. ISSN, 2252(8814), 8814.

Roidelindho, K. (2017). Penentuan Beban Kerja Dan Jumlah Tenaga Kerja Optimal Pada Produksi Tahu. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 3(1), 73-80.

Sofyan, D. K., & Syarifuddin, S. (2018). Perancangan Ulang Tata Letak Fasilitas dengan Menggunakan Metode Konvensional Berbasis 5s (Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu dan Shitsuke). Jurnal Teknovasi: Jurnal Teknik dan Inovasi, 2(2), 27-41.

Yang, T., & Hung, C.-C. (2007). Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing, 23(1), 126-137.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-09

How to Cite

Qosim, N., Kurniawan, A., Hariyanto, M. N., Emzain, Z. F., Hartono, M., & Mufarrih, A. (2021). Number of Machine and Material Requirements for Production Planning of Tablet Tooling with the Demand of 200 Units/Day. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 2(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v2i2.209