Analysis of Output Costs Standard in The Framework of Performance-Based Budgeting

Authors

  • Hanafi Hari Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Luki Karunia Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Neneng Sri Rahayu Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v4i3.3458

Keywords:

Performance Based Budgeting,, Output Cost Standards, Activity Based Costing

Abstract

This study aims to formulate the Special Output Cost Standards for the Deputy for Prevention and Monitoring of the Corruption Eradication Commission (CEC). The Special Output Cost Standards calculations are carried out using the Activity Based Costing (ABC) approach. This method is used because it is activity-based so it can be applied to public organizations and the values are more accurate. This study applies a qualitative descriptive method to explain the object of research qualitatively. Data were collected in three ways: interviews, observation, and document analysis. The locus of research is the Deputy for Prevention and Monitoring of the CEC, because it does not yet have a Special Output Cost Standards and the type of output can represent the duties of the CEC. The ABC method requires an analysis of business processes in order to effectively identify the activities required in achieving the output. The resulting Special Output Cost Standards is expected to be the best cost standard that can be implemented. The results of research on activities within the Deputy for Prevention and Monitoring found 4 outputs whose cost calculations have a little difference between the calculations of the ABC method and the realization of the previous 3 years, namely Registration of LHKPN, Examination of LHKPN, Determination of Gratuity Status and Carrying Out of The Study. These four outputs can be interpreted as having activities that tend to be the same each year, so it is necessary to propose their stipulation as Special Output Cost Standards.

 

References

Aharoni, Y. (2015). The foreign investment decision process. In International Business Strategy (pp. 10-20). Routledge.

Alotaibi, Y., & Liu, F. (2016). Business process modelling framework derive and implement IT goals: a case study. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 22(2), 161-190.

Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological indicators, 21, 17-29.

Gunawijaya, Rahmat. 2017. Evaluation of the Fairness of the Activity Budget through Analysis of Expenditure Standards with an Activity-Based Costing Approach at the Pontianak State Islamic Institute

Hénard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. An IMHE guide for higher education institutions, 1(1), 7-11.

Kamaroesid, Harry. 2013. Sistem Administrasi Anggaran Negara

Kementerian Keuangan. 2012. PMK No. 112 Tahun 2012 tentang Petunjuk Penyusunan dan Penelahaan Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Kementerian Negara/Lembaga

Kementerian Keuangan. 2018. PMK No. 102 Tahun 2018 tentang Klasifikasi Anggaran.

Kementerian Keuangan. 2019. PMK No. 208 Tahun 2019 tentang Petunjuk Penyusunan dan Penelaahan Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Kementerian Negara/ Lembaga dan Pengesahan Daftar Isian Pelaksanaan Anggaran

Kementerian Keuangan. 2020. PMK No. 232 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas PMK No. 71 Tahun 2013 tentang Pedoman Standar Biaya, Standar Struktur Biaya dan Indeksasi Dalam Penyusunan Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Kementerian Negara/Lembaga

Kementerian Keuangan. 2021. PMK No. 123 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Biaya Keluaran Tahun 2020

Kementerian Keuangan. 2022. Peraturan Dirjen Anggaran No. 4 tahun 2022 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penyusunan dan Penelaahan Rencana Kerja Anggaran Kementerian Negara/Lembaga dan Pengesahan Daftar Isian Pelaksanaan Anggaran

Kementeruan PANRB. 2018. PermenPANRB No. 19 Tahun 2018 tentang Penyusunan Peta Proses Bisnis Instansi Pemerintah

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. 2020. Peraturan KPK No. 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja KPK

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. 2021. Peraturan Pimpinan No. 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas KPK.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. 2021. Peraturan Pimpinan No. 2 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Penataan Proses Bisnis, Prosedur Operasional Baku dan Instruksi Kerja Pada KPK

Kusuma, Said Iwan. 2019. Journal : The Effect of Output Cost Standards on the Budget Efficiency of State Ministries / Institutions (Audit Agency)

Lerbinger, O. (2012). The crisis manager: Facing disasters, conflicts, and failures. Routledge.

Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., & Lofland, L. H. (2022). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Waveland Press.

Mardiasmo. 2002. Akuntansi Sektor Publik

McLeod, R. H., & Harun, H. (2014). Public sector accounting reform at local government level in Indonesia. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(2), 238-258.

Mulyadi. 2007. Activity Based Costing System

Mulyadi. 2015. Akuntansi Biaya

Nur Afiah, Nunuy. 2010. Prospek Kelayakan Penentuan Cost of Services and Charging of Services di Sektor Publik Dengan Menggunakan Activity Based Costing.

Olsen, J. P. (2004). Citizens, public administration and the search for theoretical foundations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37(1), 69-79.

Onyango, G. (2021). Whistleblowing behaviours and anti-corruption approaches in public administration in Kenya. Economic and Political Studies, 9(2), 230-254.

Paranata, A. (2022). The miracle of anti-corruption efforts and regional fiscal independence in plugging budget leakage: evidence from western and eastern Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(10).

Radhiansyah, Emil, dkk. 2014. Menuju Politik Anggaran berbasis Kinerja

RI. 2003. Undang - Undang No.17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara

RI. 2010. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 90 Tahun 2010 tentang Penyusunan Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Kementerian Negara/ Lembaga (RKA-K/L)

Ritongan, Irwan. 2012. Analisis Standar Belanja

Rogers, T., & Wynn-Moylan, P. (2022). Conferences and conventions: A global industry. Routledge.

Ruslandi, B., Akbar, B., Djaenuri, A., & Mulyati, D. (2020). Determining the Ideal Strategy and Modeling in Integrating Spending Reviews in Budget Decision Making at the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Society, 2(4), 84-94.

Schick, A. (1973). A death in the bureaucracy: the demise of federal PPB. Public Administration Review, 146-156.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian : Kuantitatif, Kulitatif dan R&D

Suwanda, D. (2015). Factors affecting quality of local government financial statements to get unqualified opinion (WTP) of audit board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(4), 139-157.

Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical Reorientation of Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance in Public Sector Administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308-316.

Zaum, D., Taxell, N., & Johnson, J. (2012). Mapping evidence gaps in anti-corruption: assessing the state of the operationally relevant evidence on donors' actions and approaches to reducing corruption.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-03

How to Cite

Hari, H., Karunia, L., & Rahayu, N. S. (2023). Analysis of Output Costs Standard in The Framework of Performance-Based Budgeting . International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 4(2), 890–909. https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v4i3.3458