Evaluation of Local Governmet Bureaucracy Reform’s Policy in Pesawaran Regency, Lampung Province, Indonesia

Hairiwira Usman; Wirman Syafri; Sutino Sutino; Diah Puspita

doi:10.37385/ijedr.v4i3.3518

Authors

Hairiwira Usman Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Wirman Syafri Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Sutino Sutino Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Diah Puspita Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v4i3.3518

Keywords:

Evaluation, Policy, Bureaucratic Reform, Regional Government

Abstract

This research aims to (1) understand why bureaucratic reform in the Regional Government of Pesawaran District, Lampung Province has not been successful, and (2) propose an effective model as a recommendation for improving the realization of regional government bureaucratic reform policies in Pesawaran Regency, Lampung Province. The method employed in this research is qualitative, utilizing the theoretical approach of the CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product) by Stufflebeam to uncover and discuss issues arising from the implementation of Regional Government Bureaucratic Reform Policy Evaluation in Pesawaran Regency, Lampung Province. The study uses qualitative analysis to answer the research problem formulation derived from the execution of the bureaucratic reform policy evaluation in Pesawaran Regency. All data were directly obtained from field informants through interviews and document studies. The results conclude that the bureaucratic reform policy in Pesawaran Regency has not been successful due to the policy implementation being merely formal administrative (context) without the support of a conducive organizational environment (input) and effective governance (process), and the broad scope of bureaucratic reform policy evaluation has not been implemented comprehensively (product). A solution model is proposed for the reasons behind the reform policy failure in Pesawaran Regency, Lampung Province, which includes Leadership, Reward and Punishment, Capability, Systematic and Collaborative approach, Digitalization, Proportional and Consistent efforts, and Responsiveness. These elements should be implemented mutually and inclusively.

References

Adi, Y. (2018). Bureaucratic Reform to the improvement of public services Challenges for Indonesia. Publikauma: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Universitas Medan Area, 6(1), 15-29.

Anggraeni, D. (2016). Bureaucratic Reform in the Empirical Perspective and Pathology. International Journal of Kybernology, 3(2), 1-14.

Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.

Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.

Johnson, B. (2000), Department of Professional Studies. Mixed Methods Research, Evaluation, Research Methodology.

Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approach.Sage Publication. (terjemahan): Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hamdi, M. (2014). Kebijakan Publik; Proses, Analisis dan Partisipasi. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. Sage.

Reid, A., Bertrand, J., & Laliberté, A. (2010). Revolutionary state formation and the unitary republic of Indonesia. Multination states in Asia: accommodation or resistance, 29-50.

Jatmikowati, S. H. (2021). A study of public policy implementation in e-administration services. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 1-23.

Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. (2017). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Routledge.

Robinson, S. C. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., 18(1), 1-24.

Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63, 101421.

Santo, T. J., Brown, J. A., Gomez, S. A., & Shirey, L. A. (2022). The Role of Program Evaluation in Keeping Army Health “Army Strong”: Translating Lessons Learned Into Best Practices. Military medicine, 187(7-8), 189-195.

Sugiarti, E., Finatariani, E., & Rahman, Y. T. (2021). Earning Cultural Values as A Strategic Step to Improve Employee Performance. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 4(1), 221-230.

Talebi, A., & Rezania, D. (2020). Governance of projects in public procurement of innovation a multi-level perspective. Journal of public procurement, 20(2), 187-206.

Tiopan, D., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). An ideal relationship between central and regional authorities in Indonesia: The 1945 constitution perspective. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 44, 716.

Visentin, C., da Silva Trentin, A. W., Braun, A. B., & Thomé, A. (2020). Life cycle sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122509.

Wirawan. (2011). Evaluasi Teori Model Standar Aplikasi dan Profesi, Contoh. Aplikasi Evaluasi Program: Pengembangan Sumber Daya.

Yuliawati, E., & Prasetyo, K. (2019, August). Bureaucracy reform implementation of legislative institutions in Indonesia. In International Conference on Psychology and Communication 2018 (ICPC 2018) (pp. 186-202). Atlantis Press.