Cooperation Policy Implementation Between the Government and Business Entities in the Provision of Infrastructure in Indonesia

Tria Sasangka Putra; Khasan Effendy; Bahrullah Akbar; Sampara Lukman

doi:10.37385/ijedr.v4i2.2328

Authors

Tria Sasangka Putra Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Khasan Effendy Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Bahrullah Akbar Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Sampara Lukman Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v4i2.2328

Keywords:

Public Policy, Cooperation Between Government and Business Entities, New Model Of Infrastructure Provision

Abstract

The problem of not optimal implementation of cooperation policies between the government and business entities in the provision of infrastructure at the Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia shows that actually the policy implementation process is still not in accordance with the policy objectives set out in Presidential Regulation Number 38 of 2015, seen from the pattern of implementation, and still has various weaknesses. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods, namely data collection by interviews, documentation and observation with data analysis, namely data reduction (data reduction), data display (display data), and conclusion drawing/verification (withdrawal of conclusions/verification) with triangulation techniques on the data obtained. The theory used in this study uses the public policy theory of Merilee S. Grindle. Grindle's (1980) model with dimensions: policy content and policy context. The contents of the policy cover (1) interests affected; (2) type of benefits; (3) extent of change envisioned; (4) site of decision making; (5) program implementers; and (6) committed resources. The implementation context includes (1) power, interest, and strategies of the actors involved; (2) institutional and regime characteristics; and (3) compliance and responsiveness. With Grindle's opinion, then the Implementation of PPP Policy in Provision of Infrastructure at the Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia will be analyzed according to the content of policy and the context of implementation. The implementation of the Implementation of the Cooperation Policy between the Government and Business Entities in the Provision of Infrastructure at the Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia. not yet optimal Researchers create a new model of Government Cooperation Policy with Business Entities in Provision of Infrastructure at the Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Transparency, Regulation, integrated system, Agility (information openness, making laws, digitally integrated system, intelligent leadership).

References

Abas, M. A., & Wee, S. T. (2014). The issues of policy implementation on solid waste management in Malaysia. International Journal of Conceptions on Management and Social Sciences, 2(3), 12-17.

Arshed, N., Mason, C., & Carter, S. (2016). Exploring the disconnect in policy implementation: A case of enterprise policy in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8), 1582-1611.

Balisacan, A. M., Pernia, E. M., & Asra, A. (2003). Revisiting growth and poverty reduction in Indonesia: what do subnational data show?. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(3), 329-351.

Bonoli, G. (2007). Too narrow and too wide at once: the'welfare state'as a dependent variable in policy analysis. Investigating welfare state change: the'dependent variable problem'in comparative analysis, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 24-39.

Carlsnaes, W. (2008). Actors, structures, and foreign policy analysis. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases, 85-100.

Cummings, B. (2012). Benefit corporations: How to enforce a mandate to promote the public interest. Colum. L. Rev., 112, 578.

Exworthy, M., & Powell, M. (2004). Big windows and little windows: implementation in the ‘congested state’. Public administration, 82(2), 263-281.

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. Sage.

Limpo, I. Y., Bachri, S., Ilmar, A., & Patittingi, F. (2018). Potret of Basic Education in Indonesia. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 69, 89.

Mubarok, S., Zauhar, S., Setyowati, E., & Suryadi, S. (2020). Policy implementation analysis: exploration of george edward iii, marilee s grindle, and mazmanian and sabatier theories in the policy analysis triangle framework. JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies), 5(1), 33-38.

Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of health services research & policy, 10(1_suppl), 21-34.

Rahmah, Y. S., & Kirana, K. C. (2022). The Implementation of Child-Friendly City Programs in Special Protection Cluster at Serang-Banten Province. Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak, 9(02), 149-162.

Tambunan, T. (2008). SME development, economic growth, and government intervention in a developing country: The Indonesian story. Journal of international entrepreneurship, 6, 147-167.

Tsebelis, G., & Garrett, G. (2001). The institutional foundations of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism in the European Union. International organization, 55(2), 357-390.

Vedung, E. (2017). Public policy and program evaluation. Routledge.