Implementation of BAZNAS Policy Overcoming Poverty and Realizing Community Welfare in Karawang District West Java Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v4i3.3592Keywords:
Policy Implementation, BAZNAS, PovertyAbstract
This research discusses the implementation of BAZNAS policies in overcoming poverty and realizing community welfare in Karawang Regency. The aim is to discuss the collection of zakat by BAZNAS to reduce the gap between the zakat obtained and the existing zakat potential, as well as to find new strategies and patterns in the implementation of BAZNAS policies. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of BAZNAS policies is quite optimal. This can be seen from the execution of the organization that is supported by competent and integrity Human Resources, the understanding of policy implementers and recipients about the importance of BAZNAS implementation, and the support of an up-to-date integrated system. The new concept generated is about the implementation of structured and patterned policies in the collection and distribution of zakat, as well as the integration of zakat beneficiary data with a priority on effectiveness, ability, and adaptation.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2012). Conceptualizing policy implementation: Large-scale reform in an era of complexity. In Handbook of education policy research (pp. 348-361). Routledge.
DeLeon, P., & DeLeon, L. (2002). What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of public administration research and theory, 12(4), 467-492.
Fowler, L. (2022). Using the multiple streams framework to connect policy adoption to implementation. Policy Studies Journal, 50(3), 615-639.
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675.
Hahn, R. W., & Sunstein, C. R. (2002). A new executive order for improving federal regulation? Deeper and wider cost-benefit analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(5), 1489-1552.
Howlett, M. (2018). The criteria for effective policy design: Character and context in policy instrument choice. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(3), 245-266.
Ishikawa, R. Z. (2020). I may never see the ocean again: Loss and grief among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S85.
Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on politics, 2(1), 55-73.
Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., 18(1), 1-24.
Sadukh, I., Lengkong, V. P., & Soepeno, D. (2023). Internalization of Knowledge Management in the Compilation of Integrated Social Welfare Data (Dtks) in Tambrauw District. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 4(7), 222-235.
Schofield, J. (2001). Time for a revival? Public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 245-263.
Thompson, J. D. (2003). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction publishers.
Weible, C. M., & Carter, D. P. (2017). Advancing policy process research at its overlap with public management scholarship and nonprofit and voluntary action studies. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 22-49.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Fritzen, S. A. (2017). The public policy primer: Managing the policy process. Routledge.
