Sell in May and Go Away or Just Another January Effect? Studied of Anomaly in Indonesia Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Restu Hayati Riau Islamic University
  • Mimelientesa Irman School of Business Pelita Indonesia
  • Lintang Nur Agia Riau Islamic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v1i1.27

Keywords:

Stocks, January Effect, Risk, Efficient Market

Abstract

Sell in May and go away is a phenomenon of return anomaly that starts in May and lasts until October. These months are called the worst months of stocks. Conversely, the months of November to April are often referred to as the best months of the stock where a higher rate of return is achieved throughout the year. Although it has not been proven academically, this phenomenon has been mentioned by various media in Indonesia such as Kontan, CNN Indonesia, and Tempo Business which are predicted to correct the JCI throughout 2017.

 The purpose of this study is to prove the phenomenon of sell in May and go away on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, and find out whether the average best return of the month is affected by the high return in January.

 The results prove that even though the average returns increase in November-April was due to the high return in January, but there was no sell in May and go away on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Under these conditions, the direction of the relationship between risk and return is the opposite that directs the Indonesia Stock Exchange to the efficient market hypothesis.

References

Bouman, Sven, and Ben Jacobsen. 2002. “The Halloween Indicator , ‘ Sell in May and Go Away ’: Another Puzzle.” The American Economic Review 92(5).

Dichtl, Hubert, and Wolfgang Drobetz. 2015. “International Review of Financial Analysis Sell in May and Go Away : Still Good Advice for Investors ? ☆.” International Review of Financial Analysis 38: 29–43.

Easterday, Kathryn E. 2015. “The January Effect Anomaly: Effect on the Returns-Earnings Association.” American Journal of Business 30(2): 114–46.

Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” The Journal of Finance 25(2): 383–417.

Fama, Eugene F, and Kenneth R French. 2004. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model : Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3): 25–46.

Fernandez, Pablo. 2015. “CAPM : An Absurd Model.” Business Valuation Review 34(1): 4–23.

Haug, Mark, and Mark Hirschey. 2005. “The January Effect.” Financial Analysts Journal 62(5).

Jacobsen, Ben, and Cherry Y Zhang. 2012. The Halloween Indicator , “Sell in May and Go Away ”: An Even Bigger Puzzle.

Markowitz, Harry. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” 7(1): 77–91.

Reinganum, Marc R, and Alan C Shapiro. 2014. “Taxes and Stock Return Seasonality : Evidence from the London Stock Exchange.” The Journal of Business 60(2): 281–95.

Sari, Fitri Aprilia, and Eka Ardhani Sisdyani. 2014. “Analisis January Effect Di Pasar Modal Indonesia.” Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 2: 237–48.

Sullivan, Ryan, Allan Timmermann, and Halbert White. 2001. “Dangers of Data Mining : The Case of Calendar Efects in Stock Returns.” Journal of Econometrics 105 105: 249–86.

Waggle, Doug, and Pankaj Agrrawal. 2018. “Is the ‘ Sell in May and Go Away ’ Adage the Result of an Election-Year Effect ?” Managerial Finance 44(9).

Werastuti, Desak Nyoman Sri. 2012. “Anomali Pasar Pasa Return Saham : The Day of Week Effect, Week Four Effect, Rogalsky Effect, Dan January Effect.” Jurnal iImiah Akuntansi dan Humanika 2(1).

Womack, Kent, and Ying Zhang. 2003. Understanding Risk and Return, the CAPM , and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model.

Yoga. 2010. “Analisis Fenomena January Effect Terhadap Return Pasar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.” Riset Manajemen dan Akuntansi 1(November): 82–96.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-02

How to Cite

Hayati, R., Irman, M. ., & Agia, L. N. . (2020). Sell in May and Go Away or Just Another January Effect? Studied of Anomaly in Indonesia Stock Exchange . International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 1(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v1i1.27