Strategy to Improve Employee Performance of the Directorate of Human Resources and General Affairs of the Public Broadcasting Corporation of Radio Republik Indonesia (RRI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v5i3.5525Keywords:
Improvement Strategy, Employee Performance, Directorate of Human Resources, General Affairs of LPP RRIAbstract
This study aims to determine the background of employee performance within the Directorate of Human Resources and General Affairs of LPP RRI which is not optimal, and to find out strategies to improve employee performance within the Directorate of Human Resources and General Affairs of LPP RRI. The research method used in the research is descriptive research method with qualitative approach. The results showed several factors affecting employee performance at the Directorate of Human Resources and General Affairs of LPP RRI. Among them, the lack of open appreciation of employees can reduce motivation and job satisfaction. The level of internal coordination that needs to be improved also has an impact on efficiency and collaboration between employees. A poorly structured recognition and reward system can reduce morale, while periodic evaluations may not be optimal in maintaining and increasing employee motivation. Work design involving inclusive attitudes, promotion of tolerance, and administrative skills need to be improved to create a positive and efficient work environment. Factors such as interpersonal relationships, communication, compensation, supervision, work facilities, employee loyalty, and work discipline also affect performance and need attention in order to improve overall performance. The strategy to improve employee performance at the Directorate of Human Resources and General Affairs of LPP RRI focuses on three main aspects, namely Motivation, Traits, and Self-Concept. In the Motivation aspect, measures such as internal motivation development, structured recognition and rewards, and flexible HR policies are implemented to create a supportive and motivating environment for employees. In the Traits aspect, improved employee management, inspirational motivation, and employee development through continuing education programs are the focus to improve organizational efficiency and employee skills. While in the Self-Concept aspect, physical, emotional, intellectual, social, and spiritual improvements are made through various programs such as fitness, interpersonal training, and professional development. Through the implementation of this strategy, the Directorate of Human Resources and General Affairs of LPP RRI is expected to create a dynamic work environment, support holistic growth of employees, and ultimately improve overall performance.
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands-resources theory. Wellbeing, 2014, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019
Bal, P. M., & De Lange, A. H. (2015). From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 126-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12082
Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Hetland, J. (2015). The measurement of state work engagement: A multilevel factor analytic study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(3), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000218
Eggers, J. P., & Suh, J. H. (2019). Experience and behavior: How negative feedback in new versus experienced domains affects firm action and subsequent performance. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 309-334. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0046
Ellington, J. K., Dierdorff, E. C., & Rubin, R. S. (2014). Decelerating the diminishing returns of citizenship on task performance: The role of social context and interpersonal skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 748-758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036102
Fahrenkopf, E., Guo, J., & Argote, L. (2020). Personnel mobility and organizational performance: The effects of specialist vs. generalist experience and organizational work structure. Organization Science, 31(6), 1601-1620. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1373
Farooq, R., & Vij, S. (2018). Moderating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2002046273
Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Voelpel, S. C., & van Vugt, M. (2019). It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717-738. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2014). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59329520
Hu, L., & Liden, R. C. (2015). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 398-413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038890
Jiang, K., Hu, J., Hong, Y., Liao, H., & Liu, S. (2016). Do it well and do it right: The impact of service climate and ethical climate on business performance and the boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1553-1568. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000138
Krishnan, R., & Scullion, H. (2017). Talent management and dynamic view of talent in medium-sized enterprises: A case study of the UK IT sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(20), 2906-2927. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1345306
Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Lee, S. M. (2016). Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: A daily investigation of leader behavior and need fulfillment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000052
Lee, J. Y., & Lee, Y. (2018). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(3), 345-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9499-2
Neher, A., & Maley, J. (2020). Improving the effectiveness of the employee performance management process: A managerial values approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(6), 1129-1152. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2019-0201
Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2020). Leadership as reframing: How leaders shift cognitive frames to promote change. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), 775-801. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0280
Rapp, A. A., Bachrach, D. G., Rapp, T. L., & Mullins, R. (2014). The role of team goal monitoring in the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 954-967. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037543
Richter, A. W., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2016). The effectiveness of organizational interventions to increase pro-social behavior in organizations: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 124-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000034
Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034
Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2016). Employee well-being and the HRM-organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12082
